Carry your professional story.
Use a shareable report when discussing services, partnerships, responsibilities or a new project.
INTRODUCING 3C STANDINGYour work tells a story.
Your work tells a story.
Build a record
that grows with you.
A living professional performance passport for individuals and companies. Bring 3C assessments, reviewed firsthand experiences and your response together in one clear account.
Private by default A right of response An ongoing record
3C STANDING
ILLUSTRATIVE PROFILE · EXAMPLE DATA
Your professional standing.
Experience. Evidence. Development.
Character75
Capability81
Capacity88
4 checked contributors · Method v1
SEPARATE SELF-ASSESSMENT76 / 100
99 / 99 rated Score history75 78 81
Example scores show different evidence sources. They are never blended into one credit or eligibility rating.
Good standing is something you keep building.
Reflect on your development. Recognise good work. Address concerns with evidence.
ONE RECORD. FOUR WAYS TO TAKE PART.Choose your
Choose your
next step.
Build a profile, contribute an experience or request a member’s report. Every contributor signs in; every report follows the same review process.
FOR INDIVIDUALS
Build your professional standing.
Bring your experience, development and direct-dealing feedback into a profile you can keep current.
Create an individual profileFOR COMPANIES & ENTITIESGive your track record context.
Build a company profile around the work your entity delivers. Company and individual ratings stay separate.
Create a company profileFOR CLIENTS & COLLABORATORSContribute a firsthand report.
Register to describe a direct professional dealing: what went well, what needs improvement and the evidence behind it.
Register as a contributorFOR REPORT READERSStart a better-informed conversation.
Ask a member for a report and review the context, dates, feedback and responses they choose to share.
Register to request a reportStanding registration has no charge in this release. Assessment dashboard editing follows the existing trial terms. Reporting, responding and viewing your standing remain available outside that trial.
FROM A CLAIM TO A CONVERSATIONShow the work.
Explain the context.
Keep improving.
Explain the context.
Keep improving.
YOUR PROFESSIONAL PERFORMANCE PASSPORTA fuller account of
A fuller account of
what you bring.
A CV introduces your experience. Your standing profile can add a current assessment, direct-dealing feedback, the response to a concern and a record of change.
Make recognition meaningful.
Invite clients and collaborators to describe specific work, outcomes and recommendations.
Turn accountability into action.
See recurring strengths and concerns, discuss what needs to change and record your next assessment.
KNOW WHAT EACH NUMBER MEANSTwo perspectives.
Two perspectives.
Clear evidence behind each.
Your own reflection and other people’s reported experience answer different questions. We display them separately so the source stays visible.
What you report
about your readiness.
Capture a dated assessment from your saved dashboard. See Character, Capability and Capacity scores, answer coverage and project context.
- A complete 99-statement assessment can produce a self-assessed composite.
- New captures add to your history, whether the result moves up or down.
- Self-reported answers remain clearly labelled and independently unverified.
What checked contributors
report about dealings.
Relevant professional conduct, delivery capability and capacity are rated against a firsthand engagement. A moderator checks the report before it can count.
- A headline score needs at least three distinct checked contributors.
- One active contribution per reviewer prevents repeated reports adding weight.
- Approved positive, mixed and concern reports use the same arithmetic.
A method you can inspect.
Each 1–5 rating maps to 0–100 using (rating − 1) × 25. Eligible contributions are averaged for each C; the three Cs have equal weight in the reviewed-feedback composite. We show the basis, contributor count, date and method version. Unrated means there is not enough eligible evidence.
THE 3C RATING BARClear bands.
Clear bands.
Useful next steps.
Your Dashboard shows the score, descriptive band and evidence source together. These launch bands describe the information supplied; they are not a comparison with the population.
A scale anchored to the assessment.
The existing 1–5 scale maps to 0, 25, 50, 75 and 100. The bands respect those anchors and reserve Exceptional for 90–100. Missing evidence appears as a neutral Unrated, never a low score.
- Priority development0–24 / 100
Prioritise support and specific improvement actions.
- Developing25–49 / 100
Build more consistent behaviours, skills and support.
- Established50–74 / 100
A working foundation with room to strengthen consistency.
- Strong75–89 / 100
Consistent strengths in the information supplied.
- Exceptional90–100 / 100
Very high ratings against the stated behaviour anchors.
Ranges above use whole numbers for readability. Exact boundaries are 0 to below 25, 25 to below 50, 50 to below 75, 75 to below 90, and 90–100. Classification uses the supplied score before display formatting. Band method: 3c-bands-2026.1.
A 90-day review prompt helps keep the conversation current. Time alone does not lower a score. New evidence, reassessment and reviewed decisions explain changes.
Standing is the record.
3C Standing brings together separate evidence sources. Each project has its own self-assessed 3C Rating. Reviewed-feedback ratings currently describe profile-wide dealings and are labelled accordingly.
Recognition needs evidence.
A high self-assessment remains self-assessed. Contributor count, moderation checks, dates, coverage and disputes stay visible. A paid package or affiliate relationship cannot purchase a stronger rating.
A benchmark to earn.
The next steps are independent measurement review, representative pilots, reliability and fairness testing, outcome research and published change control. Industry recognition must follow evidence and adoption.
RECOGNITION AND CONCERNS, TAKEN SERIOUSLYA fair process
A fair process
before a rating changes.
Registration starts the process. It does not establish the truth of a report or verify a reviewer’s professional claims.
01
Register and describe the dealing.
An identified account submits the engagement, ratings, factual account, recommendations, conflicts and private evidence notes.
02
Check the report privately.
A moderator examines identity and relationship claims, relevant evidence, conflicts and publishable content using the same criteria for every sentiment.
03
Notify the member and hear them.
The member receives an account notice and can respond. After screening, a response permits review sooner. Otherwise a 14-day window starts when the member acknowledges the notice.
04
Record a reasoned decision.
A moderator publishes or rejects the report with reasons. Approved feedback and a checked member response appear together. Eligible feedback updates the score.
SHARE WITH PURPOSEYour record.
Your record.
Your sharing decision.
Create a report link when you are ready to engage. Links expire after 30 days and can be revoked sooner. The live report includes all currently published feedback and approved responses, with disputes disclosed.
Your raw evidence notes, private contact details and account identifiers are excluded. An individual’s score is never automatically assigned to their company.
Private until you share.
- No public allegation directory
- All published feedback included
- Score source and limitations visible
- Member-controlled, revocable access
- In-account notices and decision history
Invitations are shared by copying a link. Notifications appear in your account; automated email delivery is not active.
Professional context.
Responsible human judgement.
3C Standing is an early-access professional performance and reputation record. Scores are unvalidated descriptions of supplied assessments and reviewed experiences. They do not certify character, predict success or measure creditworthiness.
This release does not support consumer credit decisions, repayment/default reporting or automatic employment, investment or other eligibility decisions. Consider the evidence, missing information, response and your own due diligence.
Understand the boundaries